%0 Journal Article
%3 conjugate sporadic.pdf
%@mirrorrepository sid.inpe.br/mtc-m19@80/2009/08.21.17.02.53
%4 sid.inpe.br/mtc-m19@80/2009/12.14.18.25
%8 Aug.
%@issn 1364-6826
%A MacDougall, John,
%A Abdu, Mangalathayil Ali,
%A Batista, Inez Staciarini,
%@secondarytype PRE PI
%B Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
%D 2009
%F self-archiving-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR
%@secondarykey INPE--PRE/
%K Sporadic-E, Conjugate, Instabilities, Wind shear, Blanketing sporadic-E.
%@archivingpolicy denypublisher denyfinaldraft24
%N 12
%P 1333-1339
%@secondarymark A2_ECOLOGIA_E_MEIO_AMBIENTE B2_ENGENHARIAS_IV B1_GEOCIÊNCIAS A2_INTERDISCIPLINAR
%T Conjugate Sporadic-E measurements
%V 71
%X During an equatorial campaign called COPEX (Conjugate Point Equatorial Experiment) ionosondes at a pair of conjugate stations in Brazil were operated for 2 months in 2002. One expected the sporadic-E (Es) layers to be rather similar at the conjugate locations. However, there were significant differences in the Es, particularly in the part of the Es trace that extends above the blanketing frequency. Considerations of the ambient conditions at the conjugate locations indicate that relatively small differences in parameters such as the tidal winds, electric fields, and background density gradients can significantly affect the structuring of the Es layer.
%@area CEA
%@documentstage not transferred
%@group
%@group DAS-CEA-INPE-MCT-BR
%@group DAE-CEA-INPE-MCT-BR
%@dissemination WEBSCI; PORTALCAPES; AGU.
%@usergroup administrator
%@usergroup simone
%@nexthigherunit 8JMKD3MGPCW/3ETL868
%@nexthigherunit 8JMKD3MGPCW/3ETR8EH
%@resumeid
%@resumeid
%@resumeid 8JMKD3MGP5W/3C9JHDA
%@affiliation University of Western Ontario
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@versiontype publisher
%@holdercode {isadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S}
%@doi 10.1016/j.jastp.2009.05.009
%2 sid.inpe.br/mtc-m19@80/2009/12.14.18.25.28